Use the laws of propositional logic to prove each of the following assertions. Start by defining a generic conditional statement p → q, and then restate the assertion as the equivalence or non-equivalence of two propositions using p and q. Finally prove that the two propositions are equivalent or non-equivalent. For example, the statement: "A conditional statement is not logically equivalent to its converse" is proven by showing that that p → q is not logically equivalent to q → p.

If the simple annual interest rate on a loan is 6, what is the interest rate in percentage per month?

Micheal is 4 times as old as brandon and is also 27 years older than brandon. how old is micheal

(01.02 mc) asap plzzzwhich of the following correctly simplifies the expression 3 to the power of 2 multiplied by 5 to the power of 0 whole over 4, the whole squared.? select one: a. 3 to the power of 2 multiplied by 1 whole over 4, the whole squared. = 3 to the power of 1 multiplied by 1 squared over 4 squared. = 1 over 6.b. 3 to the power of 2 multiplied by 0 whole over 4, the whole squared. = 3 to the power of 4 multiplied by 0 over 4 squared. = 0c. 3 to the power of 2 multiplied by 0 whole over 4, the whole squared. = 3 to the power of 1 multiplied by 0 over 4 squared. = 0d. 3 to the power of 2 multiplied by 1 whole over 4, the whole squared. = 3 to the power of 4 multiplied by 1 squared over 4 squared. = 81 over 16.