Having an issue recognizing which Trig Identities to be using when presented with a problem. If anyone can explain to me what to look for or any tips that help them that would be very appreciated

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

On a piece of paper graft y+2> -3x-3 then determine which answer matches the graph you drew

Amir wants to proportionally increase the size of a photo to create a poster for his room. the size of the original photo is shown. complete the statement and then answer the question to represent ways that amir can increase the size of his photo.