A very large study showed that aspirin reduced the rate of first heart attacks by 44%. A pharmaceutical company thinks they have a drug that will be more effective than aspirin, and plans to do a randomized clinical trial to test the new drug. a) What is the null hypothesis the company will use? b) What is their alternative hypothesis?c) Is this question dealing with 1 mean or 1 proportion

a) Null hypothesis:

b) Alternative hypothesis:

c) For this case our parameter of interest is a proportion "reduced rate of first heart attacks for a new drug". for this reason the answer would be 1 proportion and we can conduct the hypothesis with a 1 z proportion test  

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case the pharmaceutical company thinks they have a drug that will be more effective than aspirin and on this case that means a better rate in order to reduce the heart attacks (that represent the alternative hypothesis since that;s what they want to proof), and the complement would be the null hypothesis.

Part a

Null hypothesis:

Part b

Alternative hypothesis:

Part c

For this case our parameter of interest is a proportion "reduced rate of first heart attacks for a new drug". for this reason the answer would be 1 proportion and we can conduct the hypothesis with a 1 z proportion test  

number one is the correct answer

step-by-step explanation: dogs and cats are mentioned, no other animals