subject
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 06:57 oprajapati

In a survey, 500 adults in a certain country were asked how many hours they worked in the previous week. Based on the results, a 95% confidence interval for mean number of hours worked was lower bound: 40.3 and upper bound: 41.9. Which of the following represents a reasonable interpretation of the result? For those that are not reasonable, explain the flaw. Complete parts (a) through (d) below.
(A) There is a 95% chance the mean number of hours worked by adults in this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed. This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

B. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the mean is only for last week.

C. Correct

D. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval

(B) We are 95% confident that the mean number of hours worked by adults in this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

B. Flawed. This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval.

D. Correct

(C) 95% of adults in this country worked between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours last week.0D. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

A. Correct

B Flawed . This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the mean is only for last week.

D. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

(D) We are 95% confident that the mean number of hours worked by adults in a particular area of this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed; the interpretation should be about the mean number of hours worked by adults in the whole country, not about adults in the particular area.

B. Correct

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval.

D. Flawed . This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40
Ten times the square of a non-zero number is eqaul to ninety times the number
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
Arestaurant chef made 1 1/2 jars of pasta sauce. each serving of pasta requires 1/2 of a jar of sauce. how many servings of pasta will the chef be able to prepare using the sauce?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
At the electronics store you have a coupon for 20% off up to 2 cds you buy for cds with the original cost of $10.99 each the sales tax is 5% what is the total cost of your purchase
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:00
Tanyss's house has 25 windows. her brother has washed 22 of the windows. what percent of the windows has her brother washed?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In a survey, 500 adults in a certain country were asked how many hours they worked in the previous w...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 18:00
Questions on the website: 13722363