An investment services company experienced dramatic growth in the last two decades. The following models for the company's revenue R and expenses or costs C (both in millions of dollars) are functions of the years past 1990. R(t) = 21.4e0.131t and C(t) = 18.6e0.131t (a) Use the models to predict the company's profit in 2020. (Round your answer to one decimal place.)(b) How long before the profit found in part (a) is predicted to double? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) years after 1990

a) 138.32 and b) 35 years approx.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we have given that

So, Profit is given by

Difference in years of 1990 and 2020=30

So, Profit becomes :

(b) How long before the profit found in part (a) is predicted to double? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) years after 1990.

So, profit doubles , we get :

Hence, a) 138.32 and b) 35 years approx.

answer: i think it is (1,-2)

∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

step-by-step explanation:

given, a ∥ b and ∠1 ≅ ∠3 .we have to prove that e ∥ f

we know that ∠1≅∠3 and that a || b because they are given. we see that by the alternate exterior angles theorem. therefore, ∠2≅∠3 by the transitive property. so, we can conclude that e || f by the converse alternate exterior angles theorem.

we have to fill the missing statement.

transitivity property states that if a = b and b = c, then a = c.

now, given ∠1≅∠3 and by transitivity property ∠2≅∠3 .

hence, to apply transitivity property one angle must be common which is not in result after applying this property which is ∠1.

the only options in which ∠1 is present are ∠1 and ∠2, ∠1 and ∠4

∠1 and ∠4 is not possible ∵ after applying transitivity we didn't get ∠4.

hence, the missing statement is ∠1≅∠2.

so, ∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.