Eleanor was curious if triangles DEF and GHI were similar, so he tried to map one figure onto the other using rigid transformations Eleanor concluded "It's not possible to map triangle DEF on GHI using a sequence of rigid transformations, so the triangles are not similar.
What error did Eleanor make in her decision?
A. One more transformation- a rotation- would map triangle DEF onto GHI. So the triangles are similar
B. One more transformation- a dilation- would map triangle DEF onto GHI. So the triangles are similar.
C. There is no error. This is a correct conclusion

It is B. One more transformation — a dilation — would map \triangle DEF△DEFtriangle, D, E, F onto \triangle GHI△GHItriangle, G, H, I. So the triangles are similar.

Step-by-step explanation:

solution:

we have to construct

∠m nt ≅ ∠p qr

the steps to draw this construction are

step 1: use a compass to draw an arc from point q which intersects the side pq at point a and the side qr at point b.

step 2: draw a segment nt and use the same width of the compass to draw an arc from point n which intersects the segment nt at a point x.

step 3:

step 4: join points n and y using a straightedge.

step 3:

option (d).maintaining the same width of the compass as ab, draw an arc from point x such that it intersects the arc drawn from n in a point y.

to draw   congruent angles , 1. width of compasses while drawing two angles should be same i.e from point at which angle has to be drawn, 2.the distance between the two points where the compass intersects the two sides should be same while drawing any two congruent angles.

"image"

step-by-step explanation:

in most of these problems, the notation is that the point with a "prime" is the image of the point without. that is, b' is the image of b.

here, there is no dilation or reflection. there is simply translation (with no direction shown). which figure you call the "preimage" and which one you call the "image" is up to you. as a matter of convention, the naming is as described above.