In order to estimate the proportion of all likely voters who will likely vote for the incumbent in the upcoming city’s mayoral race, a random sample of 267 likely voters is taken, finding that 65% state they will likely vote for the incumbent. The polling agency wishes to test whether there is evidence that more than 50% of likely voters will likely vote for the incumbent. Evaluate the strength of evidence for this hypothesis.

Yes, there is evidence that more than 50% of likely voters will likely vote for the incumbent.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in order to estimate the proportion of all likely voters who will likely vote for the incumbent in the upcoming city’s mayoral race, a random sample of 267 likely voters is taken, finding that 65% state they will likely vote for the incumbent.

The polling agency wishes to test whether there is evidence that more than 50% of likely voters will likely vote for the incumbent.

Let p = proportion of  voters who will likely vote for the incumbent

SO, Null Hypothesis, : p 50%   {means that less than or equal to 50% of likely voters will likely vote for the incumbent}

Alternate Hypothesis, : p > 50%   {means that more than 50% of likely voters will likely vote for the incumbent}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample z proportion statistics;

             T.S.  =  ~ N(0,1)

where,   = sample proportion of voters who will likely vote for the incumbent in a sample of 267 voters = 65% or 0.65

            n = sample of voters = 267

So, test statistics  =   

                               =  5.139

Since in the question we are not given the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now at 0.05 significance level, the z table gives critical value of 1.6449 for right-tailed test. Since our test statistics is more than the critical value of z so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that the more than 50% of likely voters will likely vote for the incumbent. The strength of the evidence is 95%.

could you reply to this with the question so i can ?

c 1 hour

step-by-step explanation:

m = 2e

m = 2 so 2 = 2e

1 = e