Help. me. pls.

A research group is on a college campus and is conducting a survey regarding the coffee consumption of college students in America. They randomly select three sample groups of 100 registered students to complete their survey, which asks the students to identify the average number of 8-ounce cups of coffee they consume each day. The results of the three sample groups are shown in the table below. 0 1 2 3 4+ Sample #1 38 19 26 16 1 Sample #2 32 14 37 15 2 Sample #3 41 22 31 6 0 Given the results of this survey, if there are 12,000 registered students, which of the following ranges is the best estimate for the number of registered students that do not drink coffee?

a.4,500-6,000
b.4,500-5,000
c.3,500-6,000
d.3,800-5,000

it is D because my teacher and I did a  sample test and these were one of the questions plus i've seen people with the same answer for this question. take my word for it

answer

false

explanation

these practices describe the manner the land use outcome is attained. land management methods implemented by corporations are a mandatory because they are a driver for better land use results economically, socially and environmentally. corporations are required to understand the connection between land use , and land management practices to support sustainable land use policies

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation: