The screening process for detecting a rare disease is not perfect. Researchers have developed a blood test that is considered fairly reliable. It gives a positive reaction in 94.5% of the people who have that disease. However, it erroneously gives a positive reaction in 1.5% of the people who do not have the disease. Consider the null hypothesis "the individual does not have the disease" to answer the following questions.
a. What is the probability of a Type I error?
b. What is the probability of a Type II error?

a) Type 1 Error: 1.5%

b) Type 2 Error: 5.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability of positive reaction when infact the person has disease = 94.5%

This means, the probability of negative reaction when infact the person has disease = 100- 94.5% = 5.5%

Probability of positive reaction when the person does not have the disease = 1.5%

This means,

Probability of negative reaction when the person does not have disease = 100% - 1.5% = 98.5%

Our Null Hypothesis is:

"The individuals does not have the disease"

Part a) Probability of Type 1 Error:

Type 1 error is defined as: Rejecting the null hypothesis when infact it is true. Therefore, in this case the Type 1 error will be:

Saying that the individual have the disease(positive reaction) when infact the individual does not have the disease. This means giving a positive reaction when the person does not have the disease.

From the above data, we can see that the probability of this event is 1.5%. Therefore, the probability of Type 1 error is 1.5%

Part b) Probability of Type 2 Error:

Type 2 error is defined as: Accepting the null hypothesis when infact it is false. Therefore, in this case the Type 2 error will be:

Saying that the individual does not have the disease(negative reaction) when infact the individual have the disease.

From the above data we can see that the probability of this event is 5.5%. Therefore, the probability of Type 2 error is 5.5%

(n^3 - n)

= n(n-1)(n+1)

since it is divisible by 3 and 2 ,because it is a multiple 3 consecutive number

if, n-1 is odd then n+1 is also odd, then it is a multiple of 9

but if, n-1 is even then n+1 is also even, then it is a multiple of 4

so, largest multiple = max(9*2, 4*3) = max(18, 12) = 18

stew reads at the fastest rate of 265 words per minute.

step-by-step explanation:

it's a given that felicia reads at 260 word per minute and on connie's graph we can see that she reads 200 words per minute. since stew's table tells us that he read 795 in 3 minutes, we can divide 795 by 3 to find out how many words he reads per minute.

795/3 = 265

stew reads 265 words per minute - he reads at the fastest rate since felecia reads at 260 words per minute and connie reads at 200 words per minute.

stew (265) > felecia (260) > connie (200)