Which is a reason why historians might change their interpretation of an event?
O
A new piece of evidence is discovered.
New technology allows faster publication of results.
They may dislike the previously accepted interpretation.
An old theory may be unpopular with the general public.
O

0.16 or 16%

step-by-step explanation:

lets take a coin for example.

if you toss it twice, it has a 1/4 chance of landing on heads both times because 1/2 * 1/2 is 1/4.

with the cards, the chance of picking dog is 0.4. having two people pick one is like picking a card twice in a row. so 0.4 * 0.4 is 0.16, or 16%

no he doesnt because "-16' is negatiive

step-by-step explanation:

the radius is 2 times the diameter.

step-by-step explanation: