Mathematics, 18.03.2020 22:27 bryan9892
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:10
A, at (-2, 4), is 6 .of a'? (-8, 4) (-8, -2) (-2, -2) (-2, 4) b, at (-4, -7), isy-.of b'? (-4, 7) (4, -7) (4, 7) (-4, -7)
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30
The power generated by an electrical circuit (in watts) as a function of its current c (in amperes) is modeled by p(c)= -15c(c-8) what current will produce the maximum power?
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:00
Suppose your sat score is 2040. a college with an average sat score for admintted students of which of these would most likely be your best option?
Answers: 1
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠a...
History, 23.11.2020 18:50
Social Studies, 23.11.2020 18:50
History, 23.11.2020 18:50
Mathematics, 23.11.2020 18:50
History, 23.11.2020 18:50
Social Studies, 23.11.2020 18:50
Mathematics, 23.11.2020 18:50
English, 23.11.2020 18:50
Mathematics, 23.11.2020 18:50
Mathematics, 23.11.2020 18:50
Social Studies, 23.11.2020 18:50
Mathematics, 23.11.2020 18:50
Mathematics, 23.11.2020 18:50
Mathematics, 23.11.2020 18:50