The correlation coefficient that models the relationship between the amount of time Jason spends working out and the amount of weight he loses is −0.9547. What is the correct interpretation of this number? A) The correlation coefficient is close to 0. There is a weak positive correlation between the amount of time spent working out and the amount of weight lost. B) The correlation coefficient is close to -1. There is a weak negative correlation between the amount of time spent working out and the amount of weight lost. C) The correlation coefficient is close to -1. The correlation between the amount of time spent working out and the amount of weight lost cannot be determined. D) The correlation coefficient is close to -1. There is a strong negative correlation between the amount of time spent working out and the amount of weight lost.

idk

step-by-step explanation:

use that smart brain

answer:

step-by-step explanation:

here, the total dishes = 10

dishes having meat = 3 ( chicken, meatloaf and hamburger )

thus, the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes = number of dishes having meat / total dishes

=

therefore, the probability of not having meat = 1- the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes

=

=

=

⇒ option b is correct.

second option

step-by-step explanation:

the measures of a triangle equal 180. use that to find x.

2x+3x+4x=180

9x=180

9x/9=180/9

x=20

now you know x, you know angle a is 40°, angle b is 60°, angle c is 80°.

because angle a is 40°, the first option doesn't work.

because angle b is 60°, the second option does work.

when you add angle a and b, you get 100°. complementary means it equals 90°, so the third option doesn't work.

when you add angle a and c, you get 120°, which is not 100.

i honestly dont know