A very large study showed that aspirin reduced the rate of first heart attacks by 48%. A pharmaceutical company thinks it has a drug that will be more effective than aspirin, and plans to do a randomized clinical trial to test the new drug. a) Is the alternative to the null hypothesis more naturally one-sided or two-sided? Explain. b) The P-value from a clinical trial testing the hypothesis is 0.35. What do you conclude? c) What would you have concluded if the P-value had been 0.0035?

answer:

step-by-step explanation:

here, the total dishes = 10

dishes having meat = 3 ( chicken, meatloaf and hamburger )

thus, the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes = number of dishes having meat / total dishes

=

therefore, the probability of not having meat = 1- the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes

=

=

=

⇒ option b is correct.

answer: the four apples you took away.

step-by-step explanation:

false

step-by-step explanation:

the reason i say this is because for a certain length of sides you can pick any two and the length is wither equal or greater than the third side and in this case it's not.

3 + 5 = 8

8 is smaller than 9 which is the third side.

hope this : )

answer: can you give the

step-by-step explanation: