If we can't translate the situation into a null box is there still a way to test their claim? For example, let's say the company claims that the nuts are carefully counted to ensure that every single package has exactly 20% cashews, 30% almonds, and 50% peanuts, can we still test their claim?

a. Yes, we can still do a chi square test but we would have to adjust the numbers above since the expected values would have no error at all.
b. Yes, because the company is still making a claim about the distribution of the nuts it puts into the packages, we can test that claim the same way we did above.
c. No, there is no way to test a claim with a significance test when a situation cannot be translated into a box model. So there is no way to test their claim, period.
d. Yes, however, we cannot use a significance test. We can still test the claim by common sense, just by buying a few packages and seeing that they're not doing what they say.
e. Yes, we can still do a chi square test because the situation is essentially identical to the one above. A box model never enters into our calculations so we can proceed with the same test and the same conclusions.

The table shows the results of three plays in a football game. what is the net result of the three plays? football game 1st play 5 yards 2nd play -9 yards 3rd play 12 yards

In δabc shown below, ∠bac is congruent to ∠bca: triangle abc, where angles a and c are congruent given: base ∠bac and ∠acb are congruent. prove: δabc is an isosceles triangle. when completed (fill in the blanks), the following paragraph proves that line segment ab is congruent to line segment bc making δabc an isosceles triangle. (4 points) construct a perpendicular bisector from point b to line segment ac . label the point of intersection between this perpendicular bisector and line segment ac as point d: m∠bda and m∠bdc is 90° by the definition of a perpendicular bisector. ∠bda is congruent to ∠bdc by the definition of congruent angles. line segment ad is congruent to line segment dc by by the definition of a perpendicular bisector. δbad is congruent to δbcd by the line segment ab is congruent to line segment bc because consequently, δabc is isosceles by definition of an isosceles triangle. 1. corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent (cpctc) 2. the definition of a perpendicular bisector 1. the definition of a perpendicular bisector 2. the definition of congruent angles 1. the definition of congruent angles 2. the definition of a perpendicular bisector 1. angle-side-angle (asa) postulate 2. corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent (cpctc)

Type the correct answer in the box. use numerals instead of words. if necessary, use / for the fraction bar.