Mathematics, 05.03.2020 22:39 jossfajardo50
Michael and Derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent. Who completed the proof incorrectly? Explain.
Line AB is parallel to EF, transversal GJ crosses line AB at K and crosses line EF at L.
Michael's Proof
Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. angle AKG is congruent to angle AKL 2. Vertical Angles Theorem
3. angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK 3. Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
4. angle AKG is congruent to angle ELK 4. Transitive Property
Derrick's Proof
Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. angle AKG is congruent to angle BKL 2. Vertical Angles Theorem
3. angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK 3. Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
4. angle AKG is congruent to angle ELK 4. Transitive Property
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:50
If its non of them tell me..valerie took a day-trip. she drove from her house for a while and took a coffee break. after her coffee break, she continued driving. after 2 hours of driving after her coffee break, her distance from her house was 210 miles. her average speed during the whole trip was 60 miles per hour.valerie created the equation y−210=60(x−2) to represent this situation, where xx represents the time in hours from her coffee break and yy represents the distance in miles from her house.which graph correctly represents valerie's distance from her house after her coffee break?
Answers: 1
Michael and Derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK ar...
Mathematics, 06.07.2019 03:30
World Languages, 06.07.2019 03:30
Physics, 06.07.2019 03:30
History, 06.07.2019 03:30
English, 06.07.2019 03:30
Health, 06.07.2019 03:30
History, 06.07.2019 03:30