Peter and jade are using what they know about properties to write an expression equivalent to 2×(n+6)+3. Whose answer makes sense? Whose answer is nonsense?

Peter's work
2×(n+6)+3
2×n+(6+3)
2xn+9
2n+9

Jade's work
2×(n+6)+3
(2×n)+(2×6)+3
2n+(12+3)
2n+15

Areflection of shape i across the y-axis, followed by a , and then a translation left 6 units and down 4 units confirms congruence between shape i and shape ii. alternatively, a of shape ii about the origin, followed by a reflection across the y-axis, and then a translation right 4 units and up 6 units confirms congruence between shape ii and shape i.