Use the following information to answer the question. A pollotarian is a person who eats poultry but no red meat. A wedding planner does some research and finds that approximately 3.5% of the people in the area where a large wedding is to be held are pollotarian. Treat the 300 guests expected at the wedding as a simple random sample from the local population of about 200,000. Suppose the wedding planner assumes that 5% of the guests will be pollotarian so she orders 15 pollotarian meals. What is the approximate probability that more than 5% of the guests are pollotarian and therefore she will not have enough pollotarian meals? Round to the nearest thousandth. a. 0.421 b. 0.079 c. 0.489 d. None of these

option b) 0.079

Step-by-step explanation:

The explanation for this question is given in the attachment below.

introduction, methodology, results, discussion

step-by-step explanation:

an observational study is one which consists of actual observation to record data and then analyse the data.

there are a number of factors that should be analyzed before starting an observational study.

the main four factors are:

i) introduction:   this should be analysed to check whether the purpose of the study is correctly established and the data recorded are appropriate for the study

methodology:   the method of collecting the data, such as whether randomly selected, and whether sample size matches with the population to be studied, whether questions asked are easy to answer by common men, etc.

results: then results such as summary of data with comments should be studied thoroughly

discussion:   the last is the discussion, this can be either by management people or persons who are all interested , etc.

so firstly, we need to isolate the y variables to be able to solve these inequalities. firstly, add 0.5x on both sides of the first inequality and subtract 1.5x on both sides of the second inequality:

now since the slope is positive for the first inequality, this means that the line going upwards belongs to the first inequality, and the line going downwards belongs to the second inequality.

next, since y ≥ in the first inequality, this means that the shaded region will be above the first inequality's line, thus shading regions a and b.

next, since y ≤ in the second inequality, this means that the shaded region is going to be below this line, thus shading regions a and c.

since both lines shade region a, this means that region a is the solution.

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!