Cis the incenter of isosceles triangle abd with vertex angle ∠abd. does the following proof correctly justify that triangles abc and dbc are congruent? it is given that c is the incenter of triangle abd, so segment bc is an altitude of angle abd. angles abc and dbc are congruent according to the definition of an angle bisector. segments ab and db are congruent by the definition of an isosceles triangle. triangles abc and dbc share side bc, so it is congruent to itself by the reflexive property. by the sas postulate, triangles abc and dbc are congruent.

at first, in 1635, the evening meetings had been just for women . .

what relationship between ideas is shown in the text above?

question 1 options:

location of events

similarity of events

timing of events

examples of an idea

step-by-step explanation:

2

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

a cube has 6 sides

the probability of getting 5 on the first cube is 1/6 since only one side of the cube has 5 on it.

there are 3 sides of the cube with even number on it [2,4,6]

therefore the probability of getting even number is 3/6

for both events to happen together, the probability would be

1/6 x 3/6 = 12/36

which simplifies to 1/12

the height of the surface increases from the center out to the sides of the road.

step-by-step explanation:

as we move out we move away from the x-axis.

and as mentioned in the problem statement that height of a road increases when we move away from the center x.

hence proved that 3rd option

the height of the surface increases from the center out to the sides of the road.

is the correct option.