In the united states about one person in 8 lives in california

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What are the coordinates of the point is 1/4 of the way from a (-6, -3) to b (6, 1)? a. (-3, -2) b. (0, -2) c. (-1, 0) d. (3, 2)

Dakota earned $7.50 in interest in account a and $18.75 in interest in account b after 15 months. if the simple interest rate is 4% for account a and 5% for account b, which account has the greater principal? explain. to make it a little easier, there is an image. good luck!