In 2011, the institute of medicine (iom), a non- sléet onc profit group affiliated with the us national academy of sciences, reviewed a study measuring bone quality and levels of vitamin-d in a random sample from bodies of 675 people who died in good health. 8.5% of the 82 bodies with low vitamin-d levels (below 50 nmol/l) had weak bones. comparatively, 1% of the 593 bodies with regular vitamin-d levels had weak bones medical researchers are conducting a double-blind experiment treating high blood pressure patients with a new vitamin supplement. the researchers are conducting a hypothesis test in which a type i error is very serious, and the type ii error is not very serious. which level of significance is the best choice? one answer. o points b. o -0.05

Step-by-step explanation:

"The researchers are conducting a hypothesis test in which a Type I error is very serious, and the Type II error is not very serious."

The Type I error (false positive) is equal to the level of significance. We then have to minimize it to minimize the Type I error.

A suitable level of significance could be .

When the level of significance and the type I error is reduced, the probability of a Type II error increases (but is not very serious in this case).

step-by-step explanation:

y = | -2(-2) |     →     y = | 4 |     →     y = 4       ⇒   (-2, 4)

y = | -2(-1) |     →     y = | 2 |     →       y =   2       ⇒   (-1, 2)    

y = | -2(0) |     →     y = | 0 |     →       y = 0         ⇒   (0, 0)

y = | -2(1) |   c →     y = | -2 |     →     y =   2         ⇒   (1, 2)    

y = | -2(2) |     →     y = | - 4 |     →     y =   4         ⇒   (2, 4)  

step-by-step explanation: