(50 points to the brainliest )

the table represents the linear function f(x), and the equation represents the linear function g(x).

compare the y-intercepts and slopes of the linear functions f(x) and g(x) and choose the answer that best describes them.

x f(x)

0 1

2 9

4 17

g(x) = 3x + 1

the slope of f(x) is less than the slope of g(x). the y-intercept of f(x) is equal to the y-intercept of g(x).

the slope of f(x) is less than the slope of g(x). the y-intercept of f(x) is greater than the y-intercept of g(x).

the slope of f(x) is greater than the slope of g(x). the y-intercept of f(x) is equal to the y-intercept of g(x).

the slope of f(x) is less than the slope of g(x). the y-intercept of f(x) is greater than the y-intercept of g(x).

- "runner b is moving at a slower rate."

- "the graphs shown are graphs of distance(km) against time(min).

the slopes of this graphs are are given by:

slope = (change in y)/(change in x)

= (change in distance)/(change in time)

this is the formula for finding the speed. so, the slope of these graphs represent the speed of the runner.

taking each division in the graph to represent 1 on both axis:

runner a ⇒ speed = (2-0)/(1-0)

= 2/1

= 2 km/min

runner b ⇒ speed = (3-0)/(3-0)

= 3/3

= 1 km/min

this shows that   runner b is moving at a slower rate."

3100

step-by-step explanation:

aloha~! my name is zalgo and i am here to you out on this amazing day. to answer your question, yes, nonzero numbers can have a greatest common factor and that would be 1. still don't get it? let me considering every number is divisible by 1 and hence every number has 1 as a factor of theirs. so, if 2 nonzero numbers didn't share any gcf (greatest common factor), they would still have a factor in common and that would be 1.

i hope that this ! : p

"stay and stay proud! " - zalgo

(by the way, do you mind marking me as brainliest? i'd greatly appreciate it! mahalo! x3)