This problem investigates resolution, a method for proving the unsatisfiability of cnf-formulas. let φ = c1 ∧c2 ∧···∧cm be a formula in cnf, where the ci are its clauses. let c = {ci| ci is a clause of φ}. in a resolution step, we take two clauses ca and cb in c, which both have some variable x, where x occurs positively in one of the clauses and negatively in x ∨z1 ∨z2 ∨···∨zl), where the yi the other. thus, ca = (x ∨ y1 ∨ y2 ∨ · · · ∨ yk) and cb = ( and zi are literals. we form the new clause (y1 ∨y2 ∨···∨yk ∨ z1 ∨z2 ∨···∨zl) and remove repeated literals. add this new clause to c. repeat the resolution steps until no additional clauses can be obtained. if the empty clause () is in c, then declare φ unsatisfiable.

answer set (b) 0.5, 3/4 80% is in order from least to greatest.  

step-by-step explanation:

in order to compare rational numbers to each other, it is much easier if they are in the same form.   typically, the best form in which to evaluate rational numbers is in decimals.   in order to convert a percent to a decimal, you would divide the given percentage by 100.   you can also accomplish the conversion by moving the decimal point over two places to the left.   for example, the decimal value of 80% is 80/100, or 0.8.   in order to convert a fraction to a decimal, you need to divide the numerator by the denominator.   for example, 3/4 is 0.75.   so, for choice (b) 0.5 3/4 (0.75), 80% (0.8) is the only choice in which the numbers are in order from least to greatest.  

what graph

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

idk the answer i want to say 10 but then it would be equal so try 9 but then yeah so yeah we love edgen

from the sentence, "tomorrow morning, akiko will arrive an hour late" depicts a third person perspective because it doesn't use any pronoun to replace akiko, the subject of the sentence, and it is in singular form since akiko is only one person.