subject
Mathematics, 10.12.2019 21:31 naturallyjada33

Janet is designing a frame for a client. she wants to prove to her client that m∠age ≅ m∠che in her sketch. what is the missing justification in the proof?

segment ab is parallel to segment cd, and transversal ef intersects segment ab at g and segment cd at h.

statement justification

segment ab is parallel to segment cd with transversal segment ef given

m∠age ≅ m∠hgb vertical angles theorem

m∠hgb ≅ m∠che alternate interior angles theorem

m∠age ≅ m∠che

alternate exterior angles theorem

corresponding angles theorem

reflexive property

transitive property

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
Find the zero function by factoring (try to show work) h(x)=-x^2-6x-9
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:00
Multiply and simplify. 2x2y3z2 · 4xy4x2 how to do?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 04:00
Which expression is equivalent to the expression for the perimeter of the larger garden?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 04:10
What is the length of side s of the square shown below?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Janet is designing a frame for a client. she wants to prove to her client that m∠age ≅ m∠che in her...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 04:01
question
English, 09.10.2020 04:01
question
English, 09.10.2020 04:01
question
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 04:01
question
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 04:01
Questions on the website: 13722362