Mathematics, 10.12.2019 21:31 naturallyjada33
Janet is designing a frame for a client. she wants to prove to her client that m∠age ≅ m∠che in her sketch. what is the missing justification in the proof?
segment ab is parallel to segment cd, and transversal ef intersects segment ab at g and segment cd at h.
statement justification
segment ab is parallel to segment cd with transversal segment ef given
m∠age ≅ m∠hgb vertical angles theorem
m∠hgb ≅ m∠che alternate interior angles theorem
m∠age ≅ m∠che
alternate exterior angles theorem
corresponding angles theorem
reflexive property
transitive property
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
Find the zero function by factoring (try to show work) h(x)=-x^2-6x-9
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 04:00
Which expression is equivalent to the expression for the perimeter of the larger garden?
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 04:10
What is the length of side s of the square shown below?
Answers: 3
Janet is designing a frame for a client. she wants to prove to her client that m∠age ≅ m∠che in her...
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 04:01
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 04:01
History, 09.10.2020 04:01
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 04:01
English, 09.10.2020 04:01
English, 09.10.2020 04:01
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 04:01
History, 09.10.2020 04:01
History, 09.10.2020 04:01
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 04:01
English, 09.10.2020 04:01