*make an argument* camilla walks at a
steady pace for 5 minutes, stops in the
same location for 2 minutes, then continues
on at a faster pace for 3 more minutes until
she reaches her destination. camilla claims
that the relationship between the time spent
walking and the distance traveled is not a
function because of the time she stood still.
explain why the relationship is a function.

because she "made up time"

Step-by-step explanation:

When she increased her pace, she basically made up for lost time standing at the location. assuming that she made it in the same amount of time if she didn't stop, you can assume that she did not waste anymore time because she picked up the pace.

c: y > - 1/6x + 1

step-by-step explanation:

dashed line - meaning this < or > also not equal

solid line - meaning this < or > also equal

your answer is c because y > means up & it's shaded up, but y < means down

hope this ! : )