Guilty verdicts in court cases a reporter on cnn. com stated in july 2010 that 95% of all court cases that go to trial result in a guilty verdict. to test the accuracy of this claim, we collect a random sample of 2000 court cases that went to trial and record the proportion that resulted in a guilty verdict. state the null and alternative hypotheses. your answer should be an expression composed of symbols: ミ夭< . > , μ, μ1-12-р, p1-p2, 0.95, rho, p, p1-p2

Step-by-step explanation:

Null hypothesis : Its a statement of equality that claims that there is no significant difference between the groups being tested.

Alternative hypothesis : Its a statement of inequality that claims that there is  significant difference between the groups being tested.

Given : A reporter on cnn.com stated in July 2010 that 95% of all court cases that go to trial result in a guilty verdict.

Let p be the parameter that denotes the population proportion of all court cases that go to trial result in a guilty verdict .

Then, the the null and alternative hypotheses for the given situation will be :

c. y = 1/4 x + 5

step-by-step explanation:

first, put the equation of the line on the graph into slope-intercept form

(y = mx + b):   y = -4x + 8

second, a perpendicular line has to have "an opposite/reciprocal slope" to the original slope. so, find the "m" value in your original equation (it's -4, right? )

original slope: m = -4   perpendicular slope: change the sign to its opposite and find the reciprocal ("flip" the number)

new slope is now positive (b/c the original slope was negative 4), and it's 1/4 (not the original slope of 4 or 4/1)

c) yes, because of asa or aas