Plz asap, will give brainliest for best answer

sarah has $8 and wants to buy a combination of cupcakes and fudge to feed at least four siblings. each cupcake costs $2, and each piece of fudge costs $1.

this system of inequalities models the scenario:

2x + y ≤ 8

x + y ≥ 4

part a: describe the graph of the system of inequalities, including shading and the types of lines graphed. provide a description of the solution set. (4 points)

part b: is the point (8, 10) included in the solution area for the system? justify your answer mathematically. (3 points)

part c: choose a point in the solution set and interpret what it means in terms of the real-world context. (3 points)

14 ft 7 inches

step-by-step explanation:

since each model inch corresponds to 25 real inches, 7 model inches will correspond to

7×25" = 175"

at 12" per foot, that is 14 feet, 7 inches.

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

which would be true for stem changing verbs?

they have a consistent spelling change in the stem of the verb.

what is different about the verb “venir” as compared to other stem-changing verbs?

only the third person forms have a stem change.

which of the following could not be considered a “stem-changing” verb?

querer

which of the following would not be condsidered an event?

desfile

what word could be used in response to the following?

¿qué quieres comprar?

quero

what word could be used in response to the following?

¿dónde uds. pueden ir?

vamos  

ellos ir al centro comercial.

yo comprar un vestido.

pedimos

dónde tú?

dormes

step-by-step explanation:

a

step-by-step explanation:

the denominator cannot be the same as one of the factors.

8 denominator times 2 denominator = 16

and 7 numerator time 11 = 77

77/16= 77/16 ( they cannot be further simplified)