Read this passage from giovanna's evaluation of an argument claiming that climate change is not affected by human
activity.
niemand's article on climate change in the editorial section of today's newspaper offers a weak argument. his reasoning
consists of little more than unsubstantiated assertions that climate change is not affected by human activity.
in an effective evaluation, which element would follow this statement?
1a summary of niemand's claim
2text evidence from niemand's argument
3 a restatement of giovanna's evaluation
4 the name and source of niemand's article

the answer i think is a)

step-by-step explanation:

check the picture below.

well, the angle at the vertex d is clearly not a right-angle, let's check for the one at the vertex f which does look like,   however if it's indeed, that means ef is perpendicular to df, in which case their slopes will be negative reciprocal of each other.

so the negative reciprocal of the slope of ef is 1, however the slope of df is not 1, is 1/2, so nope, they're not perpendicular lines.

so what is the question

step-by-step explanation:

john got lost so he didn't know what to do and it was crazy because he didn't except it

step-by-step explanation:

123123 step byt step