Premises: if two triangles are congruent, their corresponding angles are congruent. △abc and △qrs are not congruent.

conclusion: the corresponding angles of △abc and △qrs are not congruent

which statement best describes this argument?

since the airplane is moving with constant speed then the distance travelled can be calculated by x=u*t

in km/h would be:

x=640*3.5=2.240 km

in m/s would be:

u=640 km/h= 640.000 m/h =640.000/ 3600 m/s =177.8 m/s

t= 3.5 h= 3.5 * 3600 s=12.600 s

then x=u*t= 177.8*12.600= 2.240.280 m

0,0

step-by-step explanation:

ca = ec

cpctc makes it so that corresponding parts of the triangle you proved to be equal are equal, the other options aren't part of the part of the triangles you proved to be equal.

step-by-step explanation:

4  

25

5258y

54.

t5

5r

54

5856

542

5458

86

.8558.65

565

565

55898

786

8/95

5896

8656265

556478