Nessa proved that these triangles are congruent using asa. roberto proved that they are congruent using aas. which statement and reason would be included in roberto’s proof that was not included in nessa’s proof?

given: angleb ≅ anglen; bc ≅ nm; anglec is right; anglem is right
prove: triangleabc ≅ triangleqnm

to plot points   for x just start at the origin (middle) and go to the left however many times it say(if the number is a positive) if the number is a negative then go right however many times it says if it is 0 go nowhere

now keep you pencil there and go up however many times it says on y(if it is positive) if it is negative then go down however many times it says. if it says 0 go nowhere.

you have just plotted a point! now when you finish plotting all of them connect them with a ruler

plot each point as (-3, 7), (0,4), (3,1), (8,-4)   in the parenthesis on the left of the comma is x and the right is y.

my guess would be b and d, but i didn’t actually get out the pen and paper. lol

what shape is