subject
Mathematics, 09.10.2019 21:30 klocke2001

Turn the implicit solution into an explicit solution by solving for t. here you will need to exponentiate both sides to get rid of the logarithm and finally some more tedious algebra to get rid of denominators, moving all terms involving t to the same side, before finally solving for t = t(t). at the very end insert the exact decimal values of all constants to get the answer as an explicit function of only the variable t.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
What does the relationship between the mean and median reveal about the shape of the data
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:10
Girardo is using the model below to solve the equation . girardo uses the following steps: step 1 add 4 negative x-tiles to both sides step 2 add 1 negative unit tile to both sides step 3 the solution is which step could be adjusted so that gerardo's final step results in a positive x-value? in step 1, he should have added 4 positive x-tiles to both sides. in step 1, he should have added 3 negative x-tiles to both sides. in step 2, he should have added 4 negative unit tiles to both sides. in step 2, he should have added 1 positive unit tile to both sides.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:20
The graph below shows the height of a projectile t seconds after it is launched. if acceleration due to gravity is -16 ft/s2, which equation models the height of the projectile correctly?
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
Find cot x if sin x cot x csc x = √2
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Turn the implicit solution into an explicit solution by solving for t. here you will need to exponen...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.10.2020 17:50
question
Mathematics, 29.10.2020 17:50
question
History, 29.10.2020 17:50
question
Social Studies, 29.10.2020 17:50
question
English, 29.10.2020 17:50
Questions on the website: 13722360