Alight bulb distributor was given a study from an led bulb manufacturer showing that led light bulbs are better for the environment than traditional bulbs. is there an incentive for this study to be biased? why or why not?

no, because neither company benefits from the survey results.

no, because the light bulb distributor trusts the led bulb manufacturer.

yes, because the led bulb manufacturer may benefit from the survey results.

yes, because the light bulb distributor wants to become a "green" company.

C. Yes, because the LED bulb manufacturer may benefit from the survey results.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that,

'An LED bulb manufacturer gives the study with the result that LED light bulbs are better for the environment than the traditional bulbs'.

Now, if the light bulb distributor further shows the result to the consumers, they would like to buy LED bulbs.

So, the demand for the LED bulbs would increase. For that, the distributor would have to order more LED bulbs from the manufacturer.

Thus, the supply of LED bulbs would increase for the manufacturer resulting in increase in revenue.

Hence, the LED manufacturer may benefit from the survey result.

last option

step-by-step explanation:

given that δdef is right and isoceles,

assuming that side df is the hypotenuse means that de an ef are the other 2 sides that intersect at 90° and are of equal length.

because they are of equal length, we can say that they are congruent

because they intersect at 90°, their slopes must be opposite reciprocals.

only the last option satisfies these conditions.

i think it's either c or d

step-by-step explanation: the entire question is extremely odd. 04 obviously refers to the interest rate. honestly i will say the answer is c. because the (2 x 12) part would mean it's compounded semiannually. i'll say choose c.