subject
Mathematics, 02.10.2019 19:00 camiloriveraveoxbgd6

If latex: \{a_i: i\in i\} is a collection of open subsets of latex: \mathbb{r} , then latex: \cup_{i\in i}a_i is open in latex: \mathbb{r}

(can this be proved without the concept of the open ball from topology)

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:20
Solve -2(4y + 6) = 52. 5 -5 8 -8 and !
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
On #16 : explain how factoring a trinomial, ax^2+ bx+ c, when a does not equal 1 different from factoring a trinomial when a = 1.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00
Someone answer this asap for the function f(x) and g(x) are both quadratic functions. f(x) = x² + 2x + 5 g(x) = x² + 2x - 1 which statement best describes the graph of g(x) compared to the graph of f(x)? a. the graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) shifted down 1 units. b. the graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) shifted down 6 units. c. the graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) shifted to the right 1 unit. d. the graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) shifted tothe right 6 units.
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:20
Data for the height of a model rocket launch in the air over time are shown in the table. darryl predicted that the height of the rocket at 8 seconds would be about 93 meters. did darryl make a good prediction? yes, the data are best modeled by a quadratic function. the value of the function at 8 seconds is about 93 meters. yes, the data are best modeled by a linear function. the first differences are constant, so about 93 meters at 8 seconds is reasonable. no, the data are exponential. a better prediction is 150 meters. no, the data are best modeled by a cubic function. a better prediction is 100 meters.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
If latex: \{a_i: i\in i\} is a collection of open subsets of latex: \mathbb{r} , then latex: \cup...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.03.2020 08:55
question
Mathematics, 21.03.2020 08:56
Questions on the website: 13722367