Sierra says that she can simplify the right side of the inequality shown by combining the terms within the parentheses but that she can't do the same thing on the left side. is sierra correct? explain. 4(y + 7) > -3 (4 + 5)

The ratios 3: 9, 4: 12, 5: 15, and 6: 18 are a pattern of equivalent ratios in the ratio table. which is another ratio in this pattern?

Questions 7-8. use the following table to answer. year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 cpi 201.6 207.342 215.303 214.537 218.056 224.939 229.594 232.957 7. suppose you bought a house in 2006 for $120,000. use the table above to calculate the 2013 value adjusted for inflation. (round to the nearest whole number) 8. suppose you bought a house in 2013 for $90,000. use the table above to calculate the 2006 value adjusted for inflation. (round to the nearest whole number)

What is the next step in the given proof? choose the most logical approach. a. statement: m 1 + m 2 + 2(m 3) = 180° reason: angle addition b. statement: m 1 + m 3 = m 2 + m 3 reason: transitive property of equality c. statement: m 1 = m 2 reason: subtraction property of equality d. statement: m 1 + m 2 = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality e. statement: 2(m 1) = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality