(being timed )
which statement correctly explains how andre could find the solution to the following system of linear equations using elimination?
8s-9t=15
7s-2t=12
a. multiply the first equation by –7 and the second equation by 8, and then subtract.
b. multiply the first equation by -7 and the second equation by 8, and then add.
c. multiply the first equation by 2 and the second equation by 9, and then add.
d. multiply the first equation by –2 and the second equation by 9, and then subtract.

answer: check all that apply, where the options?

step-by-step explanation:

ummm seems that u didnt post the attachement !

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.