The data were gathered by the following procedure, reported in the study. "between january and june 1998, parents of children aged 2-16 years that were seen as outpatients in a university pediatric ophthalmology clinic completed a questionnaire on the child’s light exposure both at present and before the age of 2 years." was this study observational, or was it a controlled experiment? explain.

This was an observational study.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given is that parents of children completed a questionnaire on the child’s light exposure both at present and before the age of 2 years.

This was an observational study since there is no treatment or control group.

We know that treatment, control groups or treatment groups are not specific to randomized control experiments.

not only in mathematics, scientific proof also are required in the other field of science. also maths proofs are of particular structure, containing steps and logics. so proving is like doing science, it is science. that's why it is important to prove. 

an inaccurate proof leads to errors, or stating results that are not accurate.  which wil mess the probelm up you dont want this

you ignore the remainder, therefore the answer is y = x+2

step-by-step explanation:

you have to divide the denominator by the numerator. you can use synthetic division or long division.

[-5] .     1 .     7 .     11

x + 2 + 1/x+5