Show that if we had used regular perturbation to solve exercise 7.6.19, we would have obtained x{1, e)= a cost+ea f tsint+ cos 31 - cost)] +0(e) . why is this solution inferior? 7.6.19 (poincaré-lindstedt method) this exercise guides you through an improved version of perturbation theory known as the poincaré-lindstedt method. consider the duffing equation +x+ex'= 0, where 0

answer

106 emergencies

step-by-step explanation:

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

step-by-step explanation:

let's assume length of parallelogram is 'l'

width of parallelogram is 'w'

the perimeter of a parallelogram must be no less than 40 feet

so, we get

we are given

length of parallelogram is 6 feet

so,

l=6

we can plug it

now, we can solve for w

subtract both sides by 12

divide both sides by 2

and we get

so,

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet