construct a complete truth table for the following set of propositions:
(j & ~k), (j ? ~l), (~l ? (k? ~ j
is the set of propositions is consistent or inconsistent?
are any two columns logically equivalen? if so which ones?
is the (~l? (k? ~k)) column a tautology, contradiction, or contingent?
assume the first three propositions are premises, and the fourth, “j”, is meant to be the
conclusion of an argument. determine whether this argument is valid or invalid.
this is all apart of the same and im having a hard time even begining the . i need a experts .