Mathematics, 12.08.2019 17:30 hdjsjfjruejchhehd
Consider the population regression of log earnings [y, where y = ln(earnings)] against two binary variables: whether a worker is married (d_1, where d_1 = 1 if the person is married) and the worker's gender (d_2, where d_2 = 1 if the person is female), and the product of the two binary variables y = beta_0 + beta_1 d_1 + beta_2 d_2 + beta_3 (d_1 times d_2) + u. the interaction term (d_1 times d_2) allows the population effect on log earnings of being married to depend on gender does not make sense since it could be zero for married males indicates the effect of being married on log earnings cannot be estimated without the presence of a continuous variable
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
What is the result of converting 60 ounces to pounds remember there are 16 ounces in a pound
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:40
What is the ordered pair that represents the linear inequality y< 6x-4
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 06:30
What is a common factor for the two fractional terms 5/8x and 11/8xy
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 07:50
Which of the following is not an identity? o a. cos2x cscx-cscx = -sinx o b. csczx+ sec2x = 1 o c. cos2x-sin2x = 1- 2 sin2x o d. sinx(cotx + tanx) = secx
Answers: 3
Consider the population regression of log earnings [y, where y = ln(earnings)] against two binary va...
Mathematics, 10.12.2020 17:10
English, 10.12.2020 17:10
Mathematics, 10.12.2020 17:10
English, 10.12.2020 17:10
Mathematics, 10.12.2020 17:10
Spanish, 10.12.2020 17:10
Mathematics, 10.12.2020 17:10
Computers and Technology, 10.12.2020 17:10
Mathematics, 10.12.2020 17:10
English, 10.12.2020 17:10