When your governor took office, 100,000 children in your state were eligible for medicaid and 200,000 children were not. now, to a large expansion in medicaid, 150,000 children are eligible for medicaid and 150,000 children are not. your governor boasts that, under her watch, “the number of children without access to health care fell by one-quarter.” is this a valid statement to make? why or why not?

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

Since we have given that

Number of children in his state were eligible for Medicaid = 100,000

Number of children in his state were not eligible for Medicaid = 200,000

After a large expansion in Medicaid, we get that

Number of children in his state were eligible for Medicaid = 150,000

Number of children in his state were not eligible for Medicaid = 150,000

According to question, , “the number of children without access to health care fell by one-quarter".

So, we check whether it is correct or not.

Difference between previous and current data who were not eligible is given by

Percentage of decrement is given by

Yes , it is fell by one quarter.

what?

step-by-step explanation:

what do you need with. i love quadrants. can you tell me ?

the correct functions are

h(x) = 3x + 2  

g(x) = 2^x

step-by-step explanation:

i proceed to calculate the different values ​​of k (x)

case 1)  k(x) = g(x) ∘ h(x)

g(x) ∘ h(x)=g(h(x))

k(x) = [2]^[3x + > is the option  4. k(x) = 2^(3x + 2 )

case 2)  k(x) = g(x) + h(x)

k(x) = [2^x]+[3x + 2]=2^x+3x+> is the option  1.) k(x) = 2^x + 3x + 2

case 3)k(x) = h(x) ÷ g(x)

k(x) =  [3x + 2]/[2^x]=3x/(2^x)+2/(2^x)=3x*(2^-x)+2^(1-x)

is the option  3.)   k(x) = (3x)2^(-x) + 2^(-x + 1 )

case 4)k(x) = g(x) - h(x)

k(x) =  [2^x]-[3x + 2]=2^x-3x-> is the option  2.) k(x) = 2^x - 3x - 2 

case 5)  k(x) = g(x) × h(x)

k(x) = [2^x]*[3x + > is the option  5.) k(x) = 2^x(3x + 2)

case 6)k(x) = h(x) ∘ g(x)

h(x) ∘ g(x)=h(g(x))

k(x)=3*[2^x]+> is the option  6. k(x) = 3(2^x) +2