subject
Mathematics, 30.06.2019 04:10 swiseman6703

(6) (bonus) here is a proof that for n > 0, 12 22 +..+2" = 2n+1. proof. suppose 1 + 2 + 2 +..+ 2" = 2n+1 for some n > 0. then 2n+12n+1 .. +2" +2"n+1. 1222 using the inductive hypothesis 2(2"+1) 2"+2 2(n+1)+1 as we needed to show. now, obviously there is something wrong with this proof by induction since, for example, 1+222 7, but 22+1 = 23 = 8. what specifically is wrong with the proof?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 13:20
Hello i need some with trigonometric substitutions. [tex]\int\limits^a_b {x} \, dx[/tex]
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30
Acircle has a circumference of 2 pi cm. which statement about the circumference and area is true? a comparison of the area and circumference is not possible since the area cannot be determined. the numerical values of the circumference and area of the circle are equal. the numerical value of the circumference is greater than the numerical value of the area. the numerical value of the circumference is less than the numerical value of the area.
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:40
Tcan be concluded that % of the seniors would prefer to see more candid pictures in this year's edition of the yearbook.
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
Solve the inequality and graph 6j - 7 < 5
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
(6) (bonus) here is a proof that for n > 0, 12 22 +..+2" = 2n+1. proof. suppose 1 + 2 + 2 +..+ 2...
Questions
question
Geography, 02.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 02.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 02.09.2020 14:01
question
English, 02.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 02.09.2020 14:01
Questions on the website: 13722363