Vera claimed the solution set on the number line represents the inequality  .  which error did vera make? vera wrote the inequality with the variable on the left side of the relation symbol. vera wrote a relation symbol that does not represent the direction of the ray. vera selected an inequality that does not include  –79 in its solution set. vera used the wrong number in her inequality.

second option

step-by-step explanation:

the measures of a triangle equal 180. use that to find x.

2x+3x+4x=180

9x=180

9x/9=180/9

x=20

now you know x, you know angle a is 40°, angle b is 60°, angle c is 80°.

because angle a is 40°, the first option doesn't work.

because angle b is 60°, the second option does work.

when you add angle a and b, you get 100°. complementary means it equals 90°, so the third option doesn't work.

when you add angle a and c, you get 120°, which is not 100.

divide the numbers

step-by-step explanation:

(1,-1) i hope this

step-by-step explanation:

first, let's see what the pattern is.

58 - x = 47

46 - x = 36

x = 9

so this means that the term after 25 is 25 - 9:

the next term in the sequence is 16.