Peter is conducting an experiment to determine whether a new medication is effective in reducing swelling. he gets 1,500 volunteers with swelling and divides them into two groups. the control group does not receive any medication; the treatment group receives the medication. the patients in the treatment group show reduced signs of swelling. what can peter conclude from this experiment?

Peter can conclude that the new medication is effective in reducing swelling

Step-by-step explanation:

The patients in the treatment group show reduced signs of swelling. therefore, Peter can conclude that the new medication is effective in reducing swelling

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that Peter is conducting an experiment to determine whether a new medication is effective in reducing swelling.

So when he divides 1500 volunteers with swelling into two groups and gives one group medication, he can find the difference in the two groups.

He can find average problem after medication/no medication for the two groups and conduct a hypothesis testing for comparison of difference of means.

This would help him to conclude whether the new medication has a significant effective role in reducing swelling.

solution:

→c= a b , that is product of a and b is possible only when when a is m × n matrix and b is n × p matrix.

that is, number of columns of a= number of rows of b.

so, size of matrix , c= a b is , if a = (m × n)matrix

b= (n × p)matrix

then a b = [ (m × n)matrix] ×[   (n × p)matrix ]

→→c= a b= [m × p ] matrix

→→size of product a b will be equal to = number of rows of a × number of columns of b

we'll this would mean that the dunk tank and the bounce house are the same for 20 hours because the 2 represents that the two activities, and the 20 represents the amount of hours they both are. so with this said, it means that the answer is c. the costs for a dunk tank and bounce house are the same for 20 hours.

c.the costs for a dunk tank and bounce house are the same for 20 hours.

hope this .