Luis rolled a number cube 60 times. he rolled the number 6 four times. which is most likely the cause of the discrepancy between luis’s experimental outcome and the predicted outcome

An unfair number cube.

Step-by-step explanation:

Theoretically he should have rolled the number 6 10 times ( 1/6 of 60). Since 4 times it a lot less than this figure, this discrepancy is most likeyl due to an unfair number cube.

the figures below are made out of circles, semicircles, quarter … find the area and the perimeter of each figure and give your answers as a completely simplified exact value in terms of π (no approximations). remember that we'll also have to cut whatever areas we get in half, since we're only dealing

step-by-step explanation:

15%

step-by-step explanation:

use the table and count the number of guesses that has two correct answers.

the following are two correct answers

10010, 01100, 11000

a total of 3 numbers having 2 correct guesses out of 20 questions.

probability of getting 2 correct guesses = the number of questions getting 2 correct answers / total number of questions.

= 3/20

to convert it into percent multiply by 100, we get

= 3/20 * 100

= 15%

the answer is 15%

you.