50 pointswhy is partitioning a directed line segment into a ratio of 1: 3 not the same as finding the length of the directed line segment? the ratio given is part to whole, but fractions compare part to part. the ratio given is part to part. the total number of parts in the whole is 3 – 1 = 2.the ratio given is part to part. the total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4.the ratio given is part to whole, but the associated fraction is .

The ratio given is part to part. The total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that partitioning a directed line segment into a ratio of 1:3 means that we are dividing the given line segment into two parts whose first part is 1 times the of some quantity while the another part is 3 times of the same quantity. So basically we are comparing part to part in by ratio. And total number of parts in the whole will be just sum of both so we get 1+3=4

Hence choice (3) is correct answer.

"The ratio given is part to part. The total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4."

describing distributions is one of the key skills you’ll need to earn a high score on the ap statistics exam. if you need proof of this, just flip through some past exam questions, which can be found at the collegeboard website. you’ll notice that the first free response question is almost always a question requiring you to look at a graph and describe it.

step-by-step explanation: just trying to get points sorry : (

5050

hope this !