Phyllis solved the compound inequality. she began by first breaking the inequality into two separate inequalities. then she correctly solved each for x

Answer : option A

16<=2(3x-1) and 2(3x-1)<28

Phyllis solved the compound inequality. She began by first breaking the inequality into two separate inequalities. Then she correctly solved each for x

3<=x   and x<5

x>=3  and x<5

Now we graph the solution

x>=3, we have = sign so we use closed circle at 3.

Then for greater than symbol we shade to the right

For x<5, there is no = sign so we use open circle at 5

for < than symbol we shade to the left

For x>=3  and x<5, we take the intersection of both graphs

So option A is the answer.

idk im srry

step-by-step explanation:

ok so the answer to your question is simple as long as you look at the different dimensions that contain the exemplary letters that combined in the right order give you words that eventually within the 5th dimension will conform and give you the correct answer to your question. hope i , stop looking at this easily, look at it with a spectral view.

step-by-step explanation:

told you