Carlos says that the xyz is not congruent to pqr because there is no ssa theorem or postulate. in two or more complete sentences, explain why or why not carlos is correct. justify your answer using triangle congruency postulates, theorems, and definitions.

He is correct because he used the congruence postulates, theorems correctly.

1. 3.4/4

2. 0.8/7

3. 0.5 x 3

4. 0.9 x 6

5. 10.8

6. 2.35

7. 0.567

8. 9.35

9. 0.02

10. 0.06

11. 0.16

12. 0.42

13. 0.63

14. 5.6

15. 8.1

16. 9.9

17. 0.28

18. 0.48

19. 0.27

20. 0.49

21. 0.45

22. 0.72

23. 0.9

24. 0.88

25. 0.75

26. 0.16

27. 0.328

28. 0.495

29. 0.72

30. 1.068