The correlation coefficient for blood pressure and amount of vegetables eaten in a group of people is −0.7. analyze the following statement: high blood pressure is caused by not eating vegetables. is this a reasonable conclusion? no; blood pressure and eating vegetables are completely unrelated no; even though there is a strong negative correlation, not eating vegetables doesn't necessarily cause high blood pressure yes; eating vegetables reduces blood pressure, so the opposite is also true yes; the correlation coefficient is below −0.5, so that implies causation

No; even though there is a strong negative correlation, not eating vegetables doesn't necessarily cause high blood pressure

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: The correlation coefficient for blood pressure and amount of vegetables eaten in a group of people is −0.7.

The value of correlation coefficient lies between -0.6 and 0.79, i.e. there is a strong negative correlation between blood pressure and eating vegetables .

But correlation does not imply causation.

Therefore, the given conclusion is not reasonable .

percentage - 25%

probability - 0.25

we know,

total amount of students in class = 20

total boys = 10

total girls = 10

no of girls who wear glasses = 10/2 = 5

probability of choosing a girl with glasses is =

number of girls wearing glasses/total number of students in the class = 5/20

thus, percentage of selecting a girl wearing glasses will be

= 5/20 × 100

= 5 × 5

25%

therefore,

probability will be 0.25

happy to

pls mark as brainliest

6(h+1)/2=a

a=area

step-by-step explanation:

its the same thing as a square or rectangle but after multiplying two sides you need to divide it by two.