Answer asap ! will give brainliest, rating, and !

She is incorrect. The sequence is neither arithmetic nor geometric.

Why isn't it arithmetic? Because the distance from 2 to 3 is different from 3 to 5

we add 1 to go from 2 to 3

we add 2 to go from 3 to 5

Put another way,

3-2 = 1

5-3 = 2

This shows that there is no common difference. Therefore this sequence isn't arithmetic

There is no common ratio as well. Pick any term and divide by its previous term

(term2)/(term1) = 3/2 = 1.5

(term3)/(term2) = 5/3 = 1.67

(term4)/(term3) = 8/5 = 1.6

The results are close, but not the exact same every time. The inconsistent results above show there isn't any common ratio. This shows us we don't have a geometric sequence.

Note: this sequence is very close to a subset of the Fibonacci sequence (if the 12 was 13, then it would work perfect)

sorry can't

step-by-step explanation:

i googled though and something came up but it was in science langueage not common english sooo

step-by-step explanation :

we know that

the measurement of the outer angle is the semi-difference of the arcs which comprises

in this problem

m< xzy is the outer angle

substitute the values

the measure of angle xoy is equal to

> by central angle

substitute the value