Which statement best explains if the graph correctly represents the proportional relationship y = 3.5x? a graph of a coordinate plane is shown. points are graphed at 1 comma 3.5 and 2 comma 7. the points are joined by a line. no, the points shown on the line would not be part of y = 3.5x no, proportions cannot be represented on a graph yes, the points shown on the line would be part of y = 3.5x yes, all proportions can be shown on the graph of this line

It does, the points shown on the line would be part of

Step-by-step explanation:

see the attached figure to better understand the problem  

we know that

A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form or

In a proportional relationship the constant of proportionality k is equal to the slope m of the line and the line passes through the origin

In this problem we have

The slope is equal to ------> is a positive slope

The line passes through the origin

therefore

This linear equation represent a proportional variation

Verify the values of the points of the graph with the equation

For

-----> is correct

For

-----> is correct

constant acceleration- a

constant velocity- c

no velocity or acceleration- b

explanation:

for body moving with a constant acceleration, the rate of change of displacement changes over time. this is proven by the increasing gradient of the curve (a) against time.

a body that is moving at constant velocity covers equal distances over equal periods of time, thus the straight line with a constant gradient c.

a stationary body   covers no displacement as time elapses. thus the flat line with   zero gradient.

answer: yes i agree that you should not put it on/p>

step-by-step explanation: the reason for this is that it wastes other peoples time and also make them fail as well and that is never good.