What are the pros and cons of truth in sentencing laws?

The Pros of Mandatory Minimum Sentences

They can lead to a decrease in serious crime. ...

They stop unjust sentencing practices. ...

They eliminate personal bias from all parties. ...

They protect society for longer time periods. ...

It limits the role of a judge. ...

It isn't always applied as it should

Cons of Truth in Sentencing Laws

Explanation:

Outside of contributing to the already high incarceration rate, the law minimizes the effectiveness of rehabilitation for certain offenders. Depending on the age of the offender when the crime was committed, even after serving 85% of his time, he will still be released in the future.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

answer: the answer is d

explanation: the answer is d because if motorcycles are always in your blind spot and you don't see them this can result into an unwanted collision and result in serious injury or death. therefore this is not a safe skill you can use regarding motorcycles.